Who Will Watch the Watchmen: Comments on the Third Judges Appointments Case

Publication Information

Journal Title: South Asian Law Review Journal
Author(s): Isha Ahlawat
Published On: 07/09/2022
Volume: 8
First Page: 146
Last Page: 151
ISSN: 2456-7531
Publisher: The Law Brigade Publisher

DOI Not Allotted [Get DOI]

Cite this Article

Isha Ahlawat, Who Will Watch the Watchmen: Comments on the Third Judges Appointments Case, Volume 8, South Asian Law Review Journal, 146-151, Published on 07/09/2022, Available at https://salrj.thelawbrigade.com/articles/who-will-watch-the-watchmen-comments-on-the-third-judges-appointments-case/


As Amy Coney Barrett’s Senate confirmation hearings aired on CNN a few years ago, it was difficult to decide whether to pity the Americans for the political quagmire that their judicial appointments have become or to admire them for the bold, democratic and transparent fashion in which they conduct the process to nominate individuals to serve in the highest court of the land. An independent judiciary is the crucible in which foundations of a free, democratic, and just society are forged. The drafters of the Indian Constitution were acutely conscious of this and devoted considerable time and thought to the matter. Several ideas were floated. The Sapru Committee proposed that judges should be appointed by the head of the state in consultation with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court or High Court concerned.[i] The Ad Hoc Committee of the Union Constitution, aiming to limit the President’s discretion, suggested two methods.[ii] One suggestion was that the President could nominate a judge, after consultation with the Chief Justice, and the nomination will have to be confirmed by a panel comprising of law officers of the Union, Members of Parliament and Chief Justices of High Court.[iii] The second suggestion stated that three persons (one of whom was appointed by the President in consultation with the Chief Justice) could make recommendations and then the procedure stated previously shall follow.[iv]

[i] Granville Austin, The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation (Oxford Clarendon Press, 1966) p 176.

[ii] Harsh Gagrani, ‘Appointment or Disappointment: Problem and Perspective to the Appointment of Judges in the Indian Judiciary’ (2010) NLIU LR 43, 44.

[iii] ibid.

[iv] ibid.

Keywords: Judicial Appointments, In Re: Special Reference on Judicial Appointment, Third Judges Case, National Judicial Appointments Commission

Share this research

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on telegram
Share on email
Share on print
Share on whatsapp

Latest Publications

South Asian Law Review Journal
Scroll to Top